Department of Environmental Quality
Supplemental Advisory
Regarding Part 201
Requirements Applicable
to Property Contaminated by Dioxin
All locations where dioxin concentrations exceed the
residential cleanup requirements of Part 201,
Environmental Remediation, of the Natural Resources
and Environmental Protection Act, PA 451 of 1994, as
amended (NREPA), are a "facility" that is regulated
under Part 201. Based on currently available data, the
Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) believes
that it is appropriate to conclude that all property within
the 100-year flood plain downstream of the City of
Midland, that is frequently flooded by the Tittabawassee
River, is a facility. Some important requirements of
Part 201 that apply to owners and operators of property
that is a facility are described below.
Disclosure that property is a facility:
Section20116 of the NREPA requires that a person who has
knowledge or information that his or her property is a
facility must disclose to any person acquiring an interest
in the property the general nature and extent of
contamination. Data documenting dioxin contamination
above residential cleanup requirements are not
available for all properties in the Tittabawassee River
flood plain. However, the data from sampling conducted
to date by the DEQ show contamination above
residential criteria on virtually all properties within the
100-year flood plain that are frequently flooded. As a
result, owners and operators of all properties that are
frequently flooded are expected to disclose available
information about dioxin contamination in the area in
order to comply with Section 20116 of the NREPA, and
to assure all potential owners learn about the existence
of dioxin contamination. This will help reduce health and
environmental risks that would otherwise result from the
actions of uninformed property owners and operators.
A person who has more specific information about his
or her property must include that information in their
disclosure. Property owners and operators may choose
to conduct sampling on their property to supplement
available data and information, and refine their disclosure
obligations. There is a possibility that property at higher
elevations within the general outline of the 100-year flood
plain may not be a facility. However, in making a decision
about whether higher areas are likely to be contaminated,
the owner or operator must consider whether soil from
lower areas in the flood plain has been relocated onto the
higher elevation area, such that contamination is now
present. If you need assistance in determining how the
disclosure requirements apply to your property, contact
the DEQ (see below for contact information).
"Due Care" responsibilities:
Section 20107a of theNREPA imposes certain responsibilities on persons who
own or operate contaminated property in order to assure
that the use of that property occurs in a manner that
protects public health and safety. The legal obligations for
"Due Care" are limited when the contamination results
from migration, as is the case with dioxin contamination
on land in the Tittabawassee River flood plain. However,
even if contamination is present as a result of migration,
the landowner, business owner, or other person who has
"Due Care" obligations must not exacerbate the existing
contamination. In general, this means following the
cautions and directives in the DEQ Soil Movement
Advisory.
Restrictions on relocation of contaminated soil:
SeeDEQ Soil Movement Advisory for details on these
regulatory requirements.
For more information
Michigan Department of Environmental Quality
Remediation and Redevelopment Division
Saginaw-Bay District Office
503 North Euclid Avenue, Suite 9
Bay City, MI 48706
989-686-8025