How much dioxin is there? "More than has ever
been measured at a site in Michigan's history." Since the
initial discovery , various phases of sampling have
been mandated by the MDEQ, each round tends to find more than any of the
previous studies. The latest testing in November 2007 reveals levels of
1,600,000 ppt,
over 17,000 times the states clean up levels of
90 ppt.
Of special note was the comment made by an
Andrew Hogarth (Saginaw News, October 8, 2002), a MDEQ Assistant Division Chief
" It was present at every depth we sampled, we didn't stop finding
it".
This page contains
summaries of the various studies:
In 2001 Phase
1, approximately 50 discrete and composite soil samples where taken in 9 areas.
In 2002 Phase 2, approximately 170 soil
samples where taken in 12 locations from an estimated 16,000 acre flood plain During Phase
1 &2 of the MDEQ Tittabawassee/Saginaw River Flood Plain Environmental Assessment
Initiative. With a few exceptions, samples where taken from public property.
Does this represent a fair estimate of the extent of contamination? Are there areas
with much higher contamination levels?
Phase 1 Sample Summary Table
All Phase 1 samples collected near confluence of Tittabawassee & Saginaw Rivers,
area just south east of Phase 2 area indicated on map above and 22 miles downstream of the
City of Midland (Dow).
Sample Site Name
Lowest ppt TEQ found in soil
Highest ppt TEQ found in soil
Farm Field
180
424
Golf Course
2529
2588
Forested area, Shiawassee National Wildlife Reserve
35
1055
Upland area, Shiawassee National Wildlife Reserve
58
765
Mitigation Site (22 miles downstream of Midland near
confluence of Tittabawassee & Saginaw Rivers
Phase 2 Sample Summary Table (note that all
"normal" values where obtained either upstream of Dow or taken from areas
outside the rivers floodplain). The tables below are a quick summary of the
findings. If you want to see all the details and are willing to wait a bit, click
here: Summary of Phase 2 Tittabawassee River Flood Plain Sampling
All dioxin data is presented in parts per trillion (ppt)
of total toxic equivalent (TEQ)
Samples where collected from 3 soil layers at each sample
location, 0-3 inches, 3-6 inches, and 12-15 inches. At certain locations, based on
property use, a surface soil sample was also collected from 0-1 inch.
Polycholrinated biphenyl (PCB) compounds did not
represent a significant contribution to the TEQ at any sample location.
Residents participating in the MDEQ
Phase 3 dioxin sampling study recently received the "draft" results. The
study was conducted on 22 Saginaw County properties in the Tittabawassee River 100 year
floodplain between June and December of 2003. 221 samples where taken.
To review the draft data, continue scrolling down or click
here to jump to the
official results available in the next section of this page.
The MDEQ has completed the total toxicity equivalent (TEQ)
calculations of dioxin, so that the results can be compared to the 90 parts per trillion (ppt) dioxin criteria RDCC generated in
accordance with Part 201, Environmental Remediation, of
the Natural Resource and environmental Protection Act, 1994,PA 451, as amended in the Part
201 Administrative Rules.
Of special note: The MDEQ sampling was
taken randomly from within a property boundary. From what we understand of the
process, they picked sites that had characteristics suggesting contamination might be
present. However, they also picked sites where they expected to find low or
"normal" levels. This might explain why "only" 40% of samples
exceeded 90 ppt TEQ. Had they focused solely on suspected "hot spots", we
suspect the percent of contaminated samples would have been much higher.
The tables below summarizes the
findings. Tables created by TRW based on draft MDEQ results.
Note: on 2/23/03, the "Analysis by sample depth table"
created by TRW reported in error 56 samples taken at the 3" depth. The correct
count is 55, the table has been updated with correct value of 55 samples as of 2/24/04.
The percentage of samples exceeding 90ppt at the 3" depth remains the same:
42% (rounded).
Analysis by sample depth
Sample Depth
Total Samples
# Samples higher than 90 ppt TEQ
Percent exceeding 90 ppt TEQ
Lowest TEQ value
Highest TEQ value
1 inch
73
27
33%
< 5 ppt TEQ
2,640 ppt TEQ
3 inches
55
23
42%
< 5 ppt TEQ
2,270 ppt TEQ
6 inches
50
24
48%
< 5 ppt TEQ
2,790 ppt TEQ
15 inches
43
14
33%
< 5 ppt TEQ
5,660 ppt TEQ
Analysis by Street/Road
Road
Number
Residences Tested
%
Residences with > 90 ppt TEQ samples
Highest
TEQ
Number
Samples
#
samples > 90 ppt TEQ
%
> 90 ppt TEQ
Adams
1
100%
260
3
1
33%
Midland
8
50%
1,570
79
20
25%
Michigan
1
100%
3,140
15
11
73%
River
7
100%
5,660
73
38
52%
Strobel
3
66%
2,640
36
5
14%
St.
Andrews
1
100%
1,340
6
4
67%
Wallace
1
100%
1,970
9
9
100%
Total
22
77%
221
88
40%
Analysis by Residence - sample aerial maps>click on address link.
See MDEQ web site for all of
them
Street (Saginaw
County)
Each row represents one residence/property
Lowest ppt TEQ
found in soil
Highest ppt TEQ
found in soil. RED indicates > 90 ppt TEQ
Number samples over
90 ppt vs Total samples
Ratio of Highest
TEQ compared to 90 TEQ.
90 TEQ=1.0
An important footnote: The MDEQ has performed a few random samplings from a few
locations on a few properties due to the high cost of sampling. Over time, flood
plain soil moves around due to floods, wind, erosion, etc.. A dioxin level
posted for a residence does not indicate the lowest or the highest contamination that may
be on a property, a sample taken a small distance away may be higher or lower.
Unless every square foot of the property is tested every year, we will never know
the true extent.
In TRW's opinion, the random sampling of 22 properties (out of ~2000) suggests
the dioxin is everywhere in the flood plain at levels well beyond the States 90 ppt TEQ,
including surface levels. If you live in the 100 year flood plain, assume your
property is contaminated, possibly with very high levels. Take precautions
immediately.
The MDEQ graph below summarizes the Dioxin & Furan
contamination discovered in Phase 1 & 2 as well as additional data collected from the
Saginaw River and Saginaw Bay. Graph was presented a the MDEQ public meeting at
Freeland High School 6/24/03.
Summary Phase 1-3
Soil Sampling
How much dioxin is there? "More than has ever
been measured at a site in Michigan's history."
Of special note was the comment made by an
Andrew Hogarth (Saginaw News, October 8, 2002), a MDEQ Assistant Division Chief
" It was present at every depth we sampled, we didn't stop finding
it".
Mr. Hogarth's comment was referring to the elevated
dioxin levels found during Phase 2 of the Environmental Assessment conducted by the
MDEQ. The Phase 2 sample testing plan include surface
measurements as well as a number of depths up to 15 inches. Highest Levels (3,400
ppt TEQ) where found at the 12-15 inches level. Highest surface level was 1,500 ppt
TEQ. Both measurements where found in the Freeland Festival Park.
The sampling in Phase 1 found dioxin
levels ranging from 35 ppt to 7,261 ppt, with anaverage level of 998 ppt. Phase 2
averaged 799 ppt with a max of 3,400 ppt in soils
downstream of Dow and actually in the floodplain. A floodplain residents yard
averaged 529 ppt with a high of 1,400 ppt. Eggs from
freerange chickens on this residents property had dioxin levels of 16 - 48 ppt
in each egg!Phase 3testing
of 22 residences found 77% had levels greater than 90 ppt TEQ, averaging 309 ppt for all
samples and depths. The Phase 3 sample testing plan include
surface measurements as well as a number of depths up to 15 inches. Highest Levels (5,660
ppt TEQ) where found at the 12-15 inches level on River Road. Highest surface level
was 2,640 ppt TEQ on Stroebel Road.
A value of 240 ppt TEQ was found at a Midland Road
residence back door: Outside the 100 year flood plain.
Secret testing
conducted by Dow in 2004/2005 found levels in Freeland Festival Park as high as
8,920 ppt TEQ and T.River sediments of 19,000 ppt TEQ.
The
results of the 2004 Pilot Exposure Investigation found house
dust in some peoples homes have dioxin levels as high as 268 ppt TEQ. This
is THREE times the 90 ppt TEQ RDCC the State allows in the dirt OUTSIDE homes.
The
MDEQ residential direct contact criteria (RDCC) is 90 ppt TEQ or above. State of Michigan average
dioxin soil concentration is 6.3 TEQ
Click
here to view summary of dioxin soil concentrations in Michigan
Click here to view MDEQ
Michigan Soil Background Dioxin Data November 1999 (large pdf file)
Click here to view a
summary of Dioxin cleanup levels used in other States, most are MUCH lower than
Michigan's.
In addition to the above, the MDEQ has posted aerial maps of all 22 properties on it's web
site, www.michigan.gov/tittabawassee .
The maps are very large pdf files, be prepared to wait a while for them to load.
9/22/03 New dioxin test results
indicate contamination lies OUTSIDE the flood plain!
Today, MDEQ released preliminary results of
dioxin testing on a Tittabawasse River residents property located in Freeland.
The most frighting result was found literally at their back door. 242 ppt
TEQ was measured at the surface. This is almost 3 times the states
maximum level Residential Direct Contact Criteria (RDCC) of 90
ppt TEQ. THE HOME IS AT LEAST 20
FEET ABOVE THE FLOOD PLAIN AND A 100 FEET FROM THE WATERS EDGE AT THE CREST OF THE 1986
FLOOD.
This development opens a 'floodgate' of questions and concerns. How did it get
there? At this point, possible causes are speculative. However, a former
resident of the area states that many years ago, it was common practice to scrape up the
flood plain soil and use as back fill in the property lying above the flood plain to
increase the size of a home's building site.
If true, residents may find their "high ground" safe havens are polluted at
levels greater than those found in the flood plain.
In addition, the former resident indicated it was common practice to mine the flood plain
dirt and haul to building sites all over Saginaw County and as far away as Clare and
Midland Counties. Until now, people living out of sight of the river thought
all of this was someone else's problem. How many have been unknowingly living in a
toxic environment and how many of those have had detrimental health effects because of it?
Another sample taken from the river bank of the Freeland property returned a value of
1,130 ppt TEQ. The area sampled lies directly under the feet of the people attending
family gatherings shown on this web sites Picture Page. A
third sample from the flood plain was below 90 ppt, speculation could lead one to believe
this depressed area at the base of the hill is actually where the dirt was excavated and
hauled up to the house. In other words, this location was "cleaned-up".
Further details of the testing will be released once the official MDEQ report
is released.
The scope of the Dow's SOW currently under development MUST be expanded to include ALL
property adjacent to the Tittabawasse river, regardless of it's "flood
plain" status. The practice of backfilling building sites was probably not
unique to this property. Further more, Dow must take IMMEDIATE ACTION to protect
residents identified with contamination within their immediate living space.
DOW, NO MORE TALK, NO MORE DELAYS, STOP THE SPIN,
DO THE RIGHT THING, TAKE ACTION, CLEAN IT UP NOW!
The above testing results where made know to Dow representatives at tonight's public SOW meeting.
"Dow Chemical Co. conducted secret dioxin studies in violation of
their operating license, say state and federal regulators -- a blow to trust
between the company and officials negotiating Dow's plan to clean up the
pollutant.
Government scientists on an April field trip stumbled across a Dow
contractor sampling Tittabawassee River sediment, said Greg Rudloff,
corrective activities project manager with the federal Environmental
Protection Agency. The state Department of Environmental Quality demanded
information from Dow, which produced a dozen studies analysts are just
starting to review. ...
We were told there was no sampling or analytical data going on, and there was," said Michelle Hurd-Riddick,
an outspoken Dow critic from Saginaw. "Now they've given us this data, but
you don't know if you have all of it. What if they only gave 75% of it? We
just don't know. ...
"We know this company has a habit of selectively presenting data," said Tracey Easthope, director of the environmental health program at the Ecology Center in Ann Arbor. She referred to last summer when
the company issued a press release implying its study of dioxin in Tittabawassee valley wildlife showed levels were safe. Weeks later, state health officials using the same data
issued an unprecedented warning against eating some game meat.
"
The state demanded the results of the studies, most of which are now
posted on the MDEQ web site,
click here.
100% of the 16 samples from the Tittabawassee floodplain down
stream of the Dow plant have dioxin levels exceeding the States 90 ppt
Residential Direct Contact Criteria.
75% of the 16 samples from the Tittabawassee floodplain down
stream of the Dow plant have dioxin levels exceeding the ATSDR 1000 ppt
TEQ Action level
A T.River sediment sample measured 19,000 ppt TEQ,
click here, see page 12.
A Freeland Festival Park sample of 8,920 ppt TEQ is almost 2.5
time higher than previous samples taken in 2003. It's 99 times higher
than the States 90 ppt TEQ RDCC and 8.9 times higher than the ATSDR action
level. This park now has the dubious honor of having the highest level of
soil dioxin (that have been released to the public) found in the flood plain
since the problem was exposed.
3,867 ppt at Tittabawassee Twp Park
Four samples taken at Imerman Park ranged from 2,157 ppt to 4,230 ppt.
Click here to view MDEQ letter to Dow requesting information after
catching them in the act of secret sampling, a direct violation of Dow's
Hazardous Waste Management License.
Comment from Michelle Hurd Riddick of the Lone Tree Council: These
results are consistent with Phase 1,
Phase 2, and Phase 3 of sampling done by DEQ over
the past three years. The conclusion has not changed. Dioxin is pervasive at
high levels the entire length of the river. Dioxin will continue to move and
be redistributed along this dynamic mobile river system. As it moves it will
continue to be deposited and re-deposited in peoples' yards, homes, public
parks and communities. Dioxin will continue to find its way into wildlife,
fish and peoples' bodies. It will continue to migrate to the Saginaw River
and to Lake Huron.
The table below is an excerpt from the Dow Study: Ecological Risk
Assessment Support Sampling.
Click here
to view the entire 136 page report (pdf), the data appears in Table 1 on
page 9.
Soil TEQ Results - ERA Support Report, Dow Chemical Company, Michigan
Operations
Sampling Location
Location ID
Sample Media
Sample Depth (feet)
TEQ (ng/kg)
Plot 1 & 2 are reference areas
upstream of the Dow Plant
Plot 1: Reference Site -
Sanford, MI
Gladwin Forest
TRU-02687
Soil
0.0-0.5
1.77
TRU-02688
Soil
0.0-0.5
0.28
TRU-02689
Soil
0.0-0.5
3.57
TRU-02690
Soil
0.0-0.5
0.42
Plot 2: Reference Site -
Chippewa Nature Preserve
CHR-02695
Soil
0.0-0.5
9.26
CHR-02696
Soil
0.0-0.5
13.90
CHR-02697
Soil
0.0-0.5
9.20
CHR-02698
Soil
0.0-0.5
16.98
Plot 3:
Smith's Crossing
(near Bailey Bridge Rd.)
All samples below this point
are downstream of the Dow Plant
MIC-02703
Soil
0.0-0.5
326.89
MIC-02704
Soil
0.0-0.5
3159.40
MIC-02705
Soil
0.0-0.5
2067.16
MIC-02706
Soil
0.0-0.5
451.22
Plot 4:
Tittabawassee Township Park
FRE-02711
Soil
0.0-0.5
1704.41
FRE-02712
Soil
0.0-0.5
1487.74
FRE-02713
Soil
0.0-0.5
3867.11
FRE-02714
Soil
0.0-0.5
1359.28
Plot 5:
Freeland Festival
Park. Highest levels found in flood
plain
02/11/06
Great Lakes National Program Office Study Update: it's everywhere
At
the February 9, 2006 Tri-County Dioxin Community Meeting, the DEQ
presented an update of the GLNPO study which presented a view of
dioxin sampling activities of the entire Saginaw Bay watershed. The
presentation made use of Google images superimposed with sampling
data comparing pre and post 2004 data. Click on the image above to see a
slide containing
all of the current data points.
Distribution of Samples
-212 total samples from 116 stations
Floodplain 115, Shiawassee-22%, Saginaw-68%, Bay-10%
Sediment 97, Shiawassee-33%, Saginaw-45%, Bay-22%
PRELIMINARY CONCLUSIONS
1) The Shiawassee River is not a significant contributor of Dioxin/Furans to
Saginaw.
2) The Saginaw River Floodplain is not as contaminated as the Tittabawassee
River Floodplain.
3) The highest TEQ concentrations, (up to 16,000 ppt TEQ) were found in the
Upper Saginaw
River Sediments (non-navigational).
4) High levels (> 1000 ppt TEQ) were found in the Lower Saginaw River and west
portion
of Saginaw Bay at depth.
NEXT STEPS
1) Report due to EPA-GLNPO -Spring 2006.
2) Incorporate Dow Studies and Agency Data into Google Earth.
01/11/07 Horrifying levels of dioxin found in and around the Tittabawassee River
ppt State Cleanup Level
is 90 ppt
MDEQ mandated sampling of the Tittabawassee River and it's banks have
discovered the highest levels of dioxin soil contamination ever found in a
region surrounding a Michigan chemical plant.
"I think the numbers are horrifying," said Terry Miller of the
Bay City-based Lone Tree Council, which has been pushing Dow and the
state to clean up previously known hotspots, at least.
"It confirms the need to address these things and address them
upstream before they get downstream," he said. "The DEQ has got to
stiffen its spine, and Dow's got to do the right thing."
DEQ Press Release
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
January 11, 2007
DEQ Contact: Robert McCann
(517) 241-7397
Dow Contact: John Musser
(989) 636-5663
Tittabawassee River Sampling Identifies Areas for Interim Clean-up Action
Recently available results from sampling along and in the upper Tittabawassee
River have identified several areas with elevated levels of dioxin and furan
that require short term response activities. The sampling results identified
certain eroding river banks with concentrations up to 84,000 parts per trillion
(ppt) TEQ, the combined toxicity of dioxins and furans, and certain in-channel
deposits with concentrations up to 87,000 ppt TEQ. The elevated sampling
results are located within areas along and in the first six and one-half miles
of the Tittabawassee River.
The sampling was taken as part of the ongoing study and investigation being
conducted by the Department of Environmental Quality and The Dow Chemical
Company. In general, the chemical profile of the in-channel and eroded bank
samples are largely consistent with earlier sampling results from the same
general area showing a mixture consisting mainly of furans with a small
percentage of dioxins.
Dow has proposed a conceptual approach and schedule for a focused pilot
corrective action plan (PCAP) to address these areas. The details of the PCAP
will be developed jointly by DEQ and Dow with measures that will ensure a timely
approach that will achieve the greatest protections for human health and
minimizes harm to the environment and natural resources. These initial
corrective action activities are scheduled to begin this month and be completed
as early as August 2007.
Preparation for implementing the interim actions is underway with Dow developing
the final plan and initiating the permit application processes with state and
federal agencies for the work to be done in and along the Tittabawassee River.
Dow has committed to working collaboratively and cooperatively with DEQ to
further refine, design and implement the plan for addressing these areas as
quickly and as safely as possible.
These findings were generated during the implementation of the DEQ-approved
sampling plan that was developed and is being implemented by Dow and its
contractor, Ann Arbor Technical Services, as part of the remedial investigation
of the Tittabawassee River required by DEQ’s hazardous waste management facility
operating license, issued to Dow on June 12, 2003.
The public will have an opportunity to ask questions about short and long-term
actions that will be developed during the February 8, 2007 Tri-Cities Community
Meeting at The Horizons Center in Saginaw Township from 7-9pm.
#####
Public Reaction
In today's DEQ Press Release it would appear Dow Chemical and DEQ
have agreed that 83,000 ppt is just too high a sediment
concentration for dioxin in the Tittabawassee River and therefore
Dow will remove it by sometime in August at the latest.
For the first time in the history of this contamination DEQ
is going to require removal of contaminated sediments
but it took an alarming number of 83,000 ppt to get any
action. Not acceptable!
These latest numbers are astounding and far exceed anything to date
found in the Tittabawassee River or floodplain. We have repeatedly
asked DEQ what's the threshold for dioxin cleanup? What number ( ppt)
would require sediment removal from the river? We have yet to get an
answer. Surely it isn't as high as 83,000 ppt! Last we were told,
Dow Chemical and DEQ could not agree upon a number. Interesting that
the regulator needs the agreement of the polluter in order to settle
on a number protective of public health and natural resources. Just
last year in Jeb Bush's Florida a community cleaned up dioxin to a
state standard of 30 ppt. In Michigan, however, everything is
negotiable with Dow Chemical.........
In the past few years DEQ commissioned a number of studies by
Galbraith Environmental Services to ascertain the ecological
thresholds. Dr. Galbraith's findings for impairment? 50 ppt (
dioixin/furan) for mammalian populations and 10 ppt to 200ppt for
avian species. State residential contract criteria is 90 ppt............Arriving
at cleanup number may not be politically comfortable but it is
certainly scientifically defensible.
Today's press release states future activities with regard to these
high dioxin numbers will include:
"...................measures that will ensure a timely
approach that will achieve the greatest protections for human health
and minimizes harm to the environment and natural resources".
Would have to assume that in an effort to achieve the greatest
protections for the inhabitants, DEQ would need an identifiable
number to clean up to that they consider
protective. What is that number?
Dow stated that the 83,000ppt is not a public health threat. Surely
DEQ will not hold their breath waiting for Dow to acquiesce
to defining a cleanup level.
As DEQ oversees Dow's next phase of mapping and sampling it is
imperative that DEQ establish the number for cleanup/removal/
interim response along the Tittabawassee River.
02/06/07 New sampling data:
100,000 ppt TEQ dioxin found in T.River
Levels as high as 100,000 TEQ of dioxin (page 303)
are noted in a recent
Geomorph study document which summarizes dioxin levels in samples collected
in and around the first 6 miles of the river down stream of Dow's Midland plant.
The report contains the results of what looks to be over 3,000 samples collected
from various depths and sites including wetlands, in channel, floodplain,
levees, and river bank terraces. Sample results seem to vary all over the place,
ranging from <10 to 100,000 ppt TEQ. Note numerous samples collected at
the surface contain levels ranging up to 30,000 ppt TEQ on the river banks (page
125) which is over 300 times the States
RDCC
(Residential Direct Contact Criteria) of 90 ppt.
Another document seems to be focused on erosion
areas. This report indicates levels as high as 9,700 ppt TEQ found in
exposed soil, over 100 times the RDCC
We assume the State & Dow will now try to put all
of this in perspective for us, the spin machine is ramping up to full speed.
The Saginaw River
11/13/07 EPA orders emergency cleanup, 1,600,000 ppt dioxin found next to park
Highest dioxin level found in Saginaw River: EPA, MDEQ and Dow at
work on emergency cleanup
Release date: 11/13/2007
Contact Information: Anne Rowan, 312 353-9391, rowan.anne@epa.gov
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
07-OPA217
(Chicago, Ill. - Nov. 13, 2007) Acting immediately on information
received from Dow Chemical Co. of Midland, Mich., U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Michigan Department of Environmental Quality and the
company have begun preliminary emergency removal activities at a
previously unknown dioxin hot spot on the Saginaw River.
Late Friday, Dow notified EPA and MDEQ of preliminary, unvalidated
results of over 1.6 million parts per trillion (ppt) of dioxin in one
sample of sediment taken from the Saginaw River. This concentration is
50 times higher than a 32,000 ppt level, previously the highest found in
the Saginaw River. It is 15 times higher than any dioxin levels found at
hot spots in the Tittabawassee River. This new Saginaw River sample came
from a location a half mile below the confluence of the Tittabawassee
and Shiawassee Rivers, roughly adjacent to Wickes Park in Saginaw.
"EPA has determined that this emergency work should be performed under
an EPA Superfund order," said Regional Administrator Mary A. Gade. "EPA
and MDEQ are working closely together on a thorough and appropriate plan
to remove this hot spot. Moreover, we must be very cautious to make
sure, through laboratory tests, that we determine the extent of this
high level of contamination. It may be only one additional hot spot or
it could cover a larger area."
Dow discovered the latest hot spot during sampling done according to its
own Sept. 14, 2007 work plan, which has not been approved by either EPA
or MDEQ.
As a result of EPA Superfund orders in June 2007, Dow is now wrapping up
the cleanup of three dioxin hot spots in the Tittabawassee River and
should be done by year's end. Those dioxin hot spots along the first six
miles of the Tittabawassee River were contaminated at levels up to
87,000 ppt, far above state and federal action levels. The area is prone
to flooding and erosion which can spread contamination.
Dioxins are highly toxic compounds that pose serious risks to human
health and the environment. EPA's reassessment of the most recent
scientific findings on dioxin indicates that it is a more potent
chemical than previously understood.
For more information about the health impacts of dioxin and eating fish
from the Saginaw River system, members of the public may call the
Michigan Dept. of Community Health at 800-648-6942 and the Agency for
Toxic Substances and Disease Registry at 312-886-0840.
Dow's Midland facility is a 1,900-acre chemical manufacturing plant.
Dioxins and furans come from the production of chlorine-based products.
Past waste disposal practices, fugitive emissions and incineration at
Dow resulted in dioxin and furan contamination both on- and off-site.
Click here for a biased
Dow media spin article released earlier today to preempt
the EPA report.
Local media bought it up hook, line, and sinker.
TV news had
the Dow spinmister John Musser comparing the find to 6 drop in a 55 gallon barrel
and
interviews with fishermen lowering their hook almost directly over the contaminated
area. Both articles are using the term "Dioxin-Like" (assume it was a
sound bite provided
by Dow) in an attempt to downplay the discovery.
Regardless of the "dow-ese" used by
the media, the samples taken near Wickes
park revel dioxin in unprecedented levels and it
is the same Dow DIOXIN found throughout the Saginaw Bay
watershed. Suffice it to say
that this is "sound science"
at it's finest.
Dioxin-Like refers to compounds
from a group of halogenated aromatic hydrocarbons that
have molecules shaped
like TCDD and produce similar toxic effects, such as certain other
chlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins (CDDs) and certain chlorinated dibenzofurans (CDFs),
polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), polybrominated biphenyls (PBBs),
brominated
dibenzo-p-dioxins (BDDs), and brominated dibenzofurans (BDFs).
Freedom of Information Act reveals extremely high levels of dioxin in Saginaw
River
UPPER SAGINAW RIVER DIOXIN SAMPLING RESULTS RAISE TROUBLING QUESTIONS
High Numbers Prompt Groups to Ask County and Corps to Rethink Dredging Project
Through the Freedom of Information Act, Lone Tree Council and Citizens Against Toxic
Substances (CATS) has learned sediment sampling for dioxin in the Upper Saginaw River,
conducted by the US Army Corp of Engineers (USACOE), far exceeds any samples identified
along the Tittabawassee River. A total of 50 samples revealed concentrations as high as 11, 812 ppt (TEQ) in the Saginaw River.
Click here for the entire Lone Tree
Council Press release