|
Are you a new visitor to this site? Click
on the Home Link on the left for background information
Negotiation Update #1: Negotiations
Resume Jeff Kelley Chief, Community
Involvement Section Superfund Division EPA Dow Web site: www.epa.gov/region5/sites/dowchemical/
About 17, 310 tons of contaminated soil has been removed from West Michigan Park and transported it to People's municipal Landfill in Birch Run Michigan for disposal. The removal was carried out by The Dow Co. with oversight by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. As of June 24, 2009, 100 percent of the park has been excavated and backfilled. As part of activities,the stream bank has been given a more gradual slope and the new bank has been stabilized using native plants. During resloping, two trees were removed at the riverbank and stone was placed at the toe of the slope to prevent erosion. Gravel access paths and pads have been placed to allow access to the riverbank for park users. Six trees were replanted throughout the park and the park has been reseeded. When vegetation is re-established the playground equipment will be re-installed and the park will be reopened to the public for use. The area in which the playground equipment will be replaced has been raised one foot from its original height. The gravel driveway and parking lot have been excavated and backfilled with certified clean fill. The parking lot driveway will be paved with asphalt. Implementation of the barrier control plans associated with the Elevated Contamination Areas 1-6 are continuing and are expected to be completed by July 1. EPA Dow Chemical cleanup website
In the 6/17/09 community meeting EPA officials reveal the new plan to address the Dioxin cleanup of the Tittabawasee River
Meeting Handouts:
Recap of meeting provided by the Michigan Messenger EPA Dow Chemical cleanup website
For other Dioxin related Health Issues, click
here
TRW appreciates Mr. Matlby's efforts in keeping track of
Dow's contamination of the Tittabawassee River.
This volume, Implementation of the Framework Agreement, Part Two, is the latest in a series of books including the Pollution Signature, The Dioxin Story, and Revival of the Tittabawassee, The Aftermath, Restoration of a Failed Ecosystem, The Aftermath, a supplemental report, and Implementation of the Framework Agreement Copies are available in local libraries.
Statement of the Lone Tree Council and the
Ecology Center on today's announcement by EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson related
to a plan to address the dioxin contaminated watershed in the Saginaw Bay.
The history of this site has been one of regulatory
inaction, and aggressive tactics by Dow Chemical to deny and delay, seeding
controversy and confusion. The company’s efforts in this regard rival the most
controversial cleanups in the nation’s history. It has been eight years since
the extent of the contamination has been known, and it has been more than thirty
years since dioxin contamination in the watershed was documented. Although the
site would outscore most sites on the National Priorities List (NPL), the site
has thus far escaped NPL listing. Although the site contains some of the highest
levels of dioxin ever measured, there have been only a few limited soil and
sediment removals to date.
Recently exposed lies in Dow's annual Securities and Exchange Commission filings illustrate their Dioxin PM project, similar to a past Dursban campaign, is in full swing. The Michigan Messenger reports:
A few comments from local citizens:
Excerpts from the the 2008 Michigan Family Fish Consumption Guide:
1. DEQ dioxin meeting May 6 2009A fairly comprehensive PowerPoint presentation by MDEQ detailed the progress on the upper Tittabawassee River. The presentation also detailed a veritable cesspool of chemicals Dow Chemical vented to the river via outfall pipes. Dow Chemical declined to participate in the meeting, talk, discuss or share any of their disagreements or plans at the meeting. Even when asked a question they sat in silence--- The Power Point/PDF is up on the DEQ website at the following link.Information shared at the meeting or in the Power Point. (Pg numbers refer to the link above)1. Final plans from Dow for the Tittabawassee River are due June 12. Dow is refusing to pay for the enhanced fish advisory signs and will no longer pay for the stenographer so the meetings are transcribed and made available to the public.3. Dow is not doing any work on the Saginaw River. Work that is being done is being conducted by the agencies and paid for by the financially strapped taxpayers4. There are 30 plus historic out falls (pg. 21): Literal sewers where Dow released hundreds of chemicals to the river besides dioxins and furans (pg 13). These areas are a priority and progress is being made.5. Detailed pictures of highly contaminated anode material used by Dow to shore up the banks near Founders Park. (Pg 9-10) This material has been an ongoing source of contamination to the river. This chlor-alkali material is in the river sediments as well as on the banks of the river.6. Miles of eroding and highly contaminated banks remain an ongoing source of contamination to the river (pg 26)7. Remediation at Reach D near the Dow plant site suffered significant scouring, releasing a number of chemicals from the sediment. The site was not fully characterized for contaminants and EPA jumped the gun a bit too quick in issuing their removal order in 2007.8. Interim Response Decision Tree (pg 57) detailing a game plan to deal with various levels of contamination. This is important information for property owners and for contaminated river banks and sediments in the river.9. Detailed graphic showing highly contaminated residential properties. ( pg 58)10. Limited sampling (after all these years in the City of Midland). Most numbers are below a 1,000 ppt but greater than 200 ppt over large areas of residential properties. (Pg 60)11. Response activities are underway by Dow at West Michigan Park and Riverside(*one admonition see below)2. Eat Smart Fish SmartEPA came through (APPLUASE, APPLUASE ) with a $75,000 for MDCH to target at risk populations eating contaminated fish from our local chemically impacted waters.
§Women of childbearing age, pregnant women, mothers nursing babies §Children under the age of 15 years old §Shore-line fishers §People who fish and eat those fish for sustenance Key Partners with MDC and EPA are Saginaw and Bay County Health Departments, First Ward Community Center and the Friends of Bay City State Park Recreation Area. Non federal matching funds in kind total $77,000 (More Applause)
3. University of Michigan Dioxin Exposure InvestigationStatistician John Kern, hired by the Department of Environmental Quality to review the UM dioxin exposure investigation recently advised regulators not to use the Dow-funded University of Michigan study as a basis for decisions about dealing with the dioxin contamination-at least until problems identified were fixed. You can link to the report on the TRW home page.It was pointed out that out of 900 + residents whose blood was sampled only 14 lived on properties where concentrations exceeded 1,000 ppt of dioxin.MDEQ stated when all the data had been evaluated the agency would then decide on the appropriate use of the UMEI.4. EPA and the Superfund Alternative SiteRegion V EPA representative stated they (Region V) were awaiting direction from headquarters on how the federal government would proceed with Dow Chemical. However, Dow remains legally obligated under their operating permit (RCRA a federal regulation) to advance categorization, sample, provide work plans and take response action.Here is the link to the EPA Region V website dealing with Dow’s mess: http://www.epa.gov/region5/sites/dowchemical/index.htmHere is the link to EPA Administrator’s letter to Lone Tree Council responding to our request and the request of river residents and state wide environmental orgs to evaluate the Superfund Alternative process initiated during the Bush Administration. To that end EPA has suspended the negotiation process. Administrator Jackson will make a decision on how to proceed. http://www.epa.gov/region5/sites/dowchemical/pdfs/admin-jackson-letter-200903.pdf Comments and perspective The sheer magnitude of this site is enormous in terms of complexity, toxicity and geographic size. And Dow digging in their heels and dictating the terms of engagement with state is destructive and disservice to the community and the resource. Bottom line Dow does not want to deal with 1. MDEQ/RCRA 2. Saginaw River 3. Saginaw Bay ----- hence the company’s request for superfund alternative process which would give EPA the lead and not MDEQ. Will expound with greater detail in the next update but to demonstrate the impact of Dow’s refusal to address Saginaw River issues? Dredging has started on the Saginaw River, which has minimal sampling to date. EPA and MDEQ both acknowledge this process will re suspend contaminated sediments in the water column advancing migration to the already sediment impaired Saginaw Bay. BUT DOW DUG IN THEIR HEELS AND REFUSES TO DEAL WITH THE SAGINAW RIVER OR INSTALL SEDIMENTS TRAPS. Instead Dow took the cash strapped taxpayers represented by MDEQ to court (filed in Midland circuit court) knowing the state has no money to take on any legal battles. Based on new data MDCH has determined that enhanced fish consumption advisories are in order, which require amending warning signs along the river system. Anticipating future needs the signs were designed to be updated by placing a laminate with the new information over existing signs. This is a low cost item, which Dow is refusing to pay for even though it is required by law as an interim response. Again taking advantage of cash- strapped taxpayers; Dow knows the state cannot afford the signs or a legal challenge. In summary Dow’s commitment to the community and resource is fickle: Doesn’t want to deal with MDEQ unless on company terms Suing the state Looking for a new “path forward” with EPA behind closed doors Refusing to place sediment traps Refusing to pay for enhanced signs Refusing to pay for a stenographer to create a public record Refusing to answer question at a public meeting when asked (May 6 2009) Refusing to do work on the Saginaw River required by their federal (RCRA) operating license which states: At the end of the four year period beginning on the date this license is issued, the licensee shall continue or commence the corrective action process for any of the off-site areas that are identified in Condition XI.B.6. Identified in Condition x1.B.6 is the Saginaw River, its floodplain and Saginaw Bay. Fours years from license issue (June 12 2003) is June 2007. Dow acknowledged that commitment when Dow’s Sue Carrington signed on the dotted line in 2003 sealing a contract with the people of this region and this state to address their contamination. In early 2004 Dow began push back with MDEQ and have done so since then. Now they want the EPA to take over. Likely to set up a re-match of the 1980’s feud when Dow dominated push back with EPA and sent them running. EPA turned it over to MDEQ in the mid 90’s. Now EPA is entertaining getting back on the merry go round. Frankly it’s a nauseating 30 year old ride that has got to stop. *Let’s look at Riverside and W. Michigan Park. Dow’s work being done on Riverside and West Michigan Park is being done under orders from the federal government. Failure to do so would result in EPA doing the work and applying treble damages: Treble damages, in law, is a term that indicates that a statute permits a court to triple the amount of the actual damages to be awarded to a prevailing plaintiff, in this case EPA, generally in order to punish the losing party for willful conduct. Not to say what Dow is doing is not important, because it is, but let’s not hoist the red diamond and salute them for being good corporate neighbors-- they are doing it with a gun to their head. Everyone appreciates what Dow’s philanthropy in these tough economic times. But they are also taking advantage of these most unfortunate times--- Dow is revealing a greater commitment to its public persona and PR then to real substance and commitment to GREAT LAKES BAY REGION. ---Michigan largest watershed. More soon on the, SAS, dredge project (www.dredgeitright.org) Saginaw Bay and some old EPA documents. Best Regards, To view past Lone Tree Council / TRW Dioxin Updates, click here
A few snippets from the Michigan Messenger : This satellite photo shows a plume of sediments entering the Saginaw Bay from
the Saginaw River ...Although local, state and federal environmental officials agree that dredging will cause contamination to migrate downstream, DEQ officials have been unsuccessful in getting Dow Chemical to install sediment traps to limit the migration of toxins. ...“We want to minimize stirring up contamination in these sediments,” he said, but the agency has not been able to negotiate installation of containment measures. ...Dioxin and other toxins dumped into the Saginaw River watershed have been shown to end up in Lake Huron’s Saginaw Bay, where the cities of Bay City and Saginaw get their municipal drinking water.
...With the dredging underway, it appears that no agency has stepped forward
with a plan to set up monitoring of area drinking water.
An article in today's Detroit News by AP Environmental writer John Flesher reveals that
This is not the first critical review of the University of Michigan study. Back in October of 2006, ChemTelligence Inc. released an analysis of the U of M study with the following points:
The ATSDR and MDCH Health Consultation Pilot Exposure Investigation performed back in 2005 spent approximately $40,000 and used samples from 11 actual floodplain residents. The Dow/Garabrant cost $15,000,000 study and uses 14? Evidently the extra $14,960,000 Dow spent bought a study designed to obscure the facts.
The reports last statement above is important in real scientific studies such as the PEI but is evidently "optional" in the junk science of a Dow Chemical study and those who promote it as fact.
A
letter was sent 4/28/09 to EPA Administrator Jackson and
President Obama today encouraging the EPA to cancel the unnecessary
Dioxin Science Advisory Board process and release the long-delayed
Dioxin Reassessment. We wish to thank the Center for Health,
Environment, & Justice for organizing a united front on this issue.
The letter is signed by dozens of organizations from across the
country representing communities impacted by Dioxin including:
Following the letter contains
quotes from many of the dioxin impacted communities
explaining why this issue matters to you.
We urge the EPA to cancel the Science Advisory Board’s review of
EPA’s Dioxin Reassessment, release this long awaited report, and
move ahead in setting dioxin policies that will protect the health
of the our communities and the American people.
------------------------------------------
Quotes From Dioxin-Impacted
Communities
“In Connecticut, our two largest and
poorest cities, Hartford and Bridgeport, have the fifth and eleventh
largest trash incinerators in the U.S. More than 300 trucks per day
from over 80 suburban towns bring their garbage to these two cities
to incinerate. We believe that our residents suffer from high rates
of asthma, allergies, cancer, endometriosis, and diabetes from these
facilities. We must remove dioxins and other toxins from the waste
stream,” said Mark Mitchell, President of the Connecticut
Coalition for Environmental Justice.
"People are sick and dying
in our community because of the high levels of dioxins found in our
blood,” said Mr. Edgar Mouton of Mossville Environmental Action
Now.
“Dow's dioxin is a major and significant public health threat and
environmental black eye for Michigan's largest watershed. Failure to
release the dioxin reassessment has been instrumental in allowing
Dow to manufacture uncertainty about the toxicity of dioxin and
manipulate the science of dioxin. Failure to release the dioxin
reassessment has allowed the polluter to prevail as the authority on
dioxin--- delaying public health protection and a time= ly cleanup.
The next generation of children are growing up on this contaminated
floodplain. Enough already,” said Michelle Hurd Riddick of the
Lone Tree Council.
“ As Arctic Indigenous Peoples we are
living in the frontlines of a toxic chemical assault. Dioxin is
found in our traditional foods, our breast milk and our children.
The United States has a Government-to-Government legal trust
responsibility to the Federally Recognized Tribes and the EPA must
stop the delay of getting this important information out. This
information could be used to protect the health and environment of
Indigenous Peoples. Why would the EPA want to delay protecting the
health of our children and our Peoples?,” said Shawna Larson from
the Chickaloon Tribe in Alaska.
“The Learning Disabilities Association of
America, with affiliates in 43 states advocating for children and
adults with learning disabilities, joins the call for EPA to take
long-overdue action on dioxin. Dioxin poses a major threat to
healthy fetal development, and can particularly interfere with
thyroid hormones, which are essential to healthy brain development.
Scientific studies have linked low levels of dioxin to lasting
immune system and neurodevelopment effects such as learning deficits
and lowered IQ scores. Moreover, this highly toxic chemical
persists for an extraordinarily long time in the environment,” said
Maureen Swanson of the Learning Disabilities Association of
America.
"The Ironbound community is the home of
the Diamond Alkali Superfund site, one of the largest sites of
dioxin contamination in the world, the place where Agent Orange was
produced for many decades. Dioxin has poisoned our Passaic River and
contaminated our land and our air also through the incinerator in
our backyard,” said Ana Baptista of the Ironbound Community
Corporation.
"California has many dioxin sources,
despite years of community activity to stop the construction and
re-licensing of dioxin-spewing industrial activities such as
incinerators, chemical manufacturing plants, cement plants, and
refineries. Communities have a right to know the truth about the
toxicity of dioxin,” said Jane Williams, Executive Director of
California Communities Against Toxics.
"With sources of dioxin
present throughout our already over burdened community, we believe
it is very important to consistently reevaluate the risk associated
with exposures to these persistent organic pollutants. With
elevated cancer risk, developmental delays and chronic disease
characterizing our community it is important that we take a holistic
approach to identifying and evaluating sources of exposure. We
cannot stand and watch our community be impacted by the by-products
of our unsustainable lifestyle linked to the sources of dioxin in US
air. We host a cement kiln, sewage treatment plants, many hospitals
with waste incinerators and municipal waste facilities. The time
has come for science to meet activism and work for the greater
good,” said Ogonnaya Dotson-Newman of WE ACT for Environmental
Justice, Inc. (WE ACT).
"Agent Orange/Dioxin
contamination still continues to effect Vietnam Veterans from the
contamination in the Passaic River and other hot spots within New
Jersey,” said Michael Eckstein of New Jersey State Council,
Vietnam Veterans of America.
“We
have one of, if not the largest, sites of dioxin contamination in
our rivers. Over 50 miles of our waterways are contaminated with
dioxin as a result of the Dow Chemical Company. We have a very
strong interest in the release of this report, and hope it will
counter Dow’s misinformation about dioxin,”
said Terry Miller of
Lone Tree Council.
“Many pulp and paper mills in Maine are
still heavily dependent on chorine dioxide to delignify and bleach
their pulp. This makes such mills less competitive when compared to
mills that use oxygen delignification and ozone bleaching, and
Mainer’s still have to limit their consumption of fish from rivers
where these mills discharge waste due in part to dioxin
contamination,” said Nick Bennett, Staff Scientist of Natural
Resources Council of Maine.
“AAIDD's Environmental Health Initiative
firmly believes that all people have the right to live, work, play
and pray in a safe and healthy environment. AAIDD is especially
concerned about chemicals in the environment that are linked with
adverse health outcomes such as learning and developmental
disabilities. Endocrine disrupting chemicals like dioxin pose a
serious threat for both the developing brain and for those already
living with disabilities. Precaution should be taken in our
communities to protect our most vulnerable populations, such as
children and those living with a learning or developmental
disability. Regulating harmful chemicals like dioxin is a necessary
step in protecting these populations,” said Laura Abulafia of the
American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities
(Formerly AAMR).
“We have a superfund site in the middle of
our largest city, Portland, Oregon, that is contaminated with dioxin
among other things. This report has been more than 15 years in the
making,” said Jane Harris, Executive Director of the Oregon
Center for Environmental Health.
“I live on the Tittabawassee River about
12 miles downstream from the Dow Chemical plant and World HQ in
Midland MI. It has been 8+ years now since the revelation of the
high concentration of dioxin, furans and a host of other highly
toxic compounds was made public. 8 years of political corruption at
all levels of government, by both major parties and all agencies
involved. 8 more years of declining health for my entire family. 8
years of mostly inaction by both agencies, the EPA and the MDEQ to
actively start a cleanup process. 8 years of ALL residents in harms
way being placed on ignore. The cleanup of an area of this
magnitude, two rivers totaling 50+ miles, countless thousands of
acres of flood plain and the entire Saginaw Bay is simply mind
boggling. The length of the river alone dictates decades of
clean-up. Yet, with this knowledge in mind, the EPA continues to
barter with Dow and our Governor while considering us a sacrificial
lambs,” said John Taylor of Saginaw, MI.
"Our community, Rochester, New York has
been impacted by the release of dioxin by the Eastman Kodak Company.
We have= extremely high rates of certain cancers which we believe
could have been caused by this most toxic of chemicals,” said
Judy Braiman of Rochesterians Against Misuse of Pesticides.
"Glynn County, Georgia, is contaminated by
dioxin from wood preserving, chemical manufacturing, pulp mill, and
chlorine production. For 20 years, the delayed assessment has
contributed to keeping our community from being cleaned up and our
citizens' health protected. Release the Dioxin Reassessment now,”
said Bill Owens, President of Glynn Environmental Coalition.
“The Merrimack Valley
communities have survived the Industrial Revolution only to be
burdened with a dioxin legacy from trash and sludge incineration,
help us move to a more sustainable future by addressing the
persistent pollution we have experienced,” said Brent Baeslack of
the Haverhill Environmental League.
"EPA must protect our human
right to health and immediately establish strict dioxin policies
that will protect the health of all communities throughout America,”
said Monique Harden of Advocates for Environmental Human Rights.
“Dioxins are known breast
carcinogens and endocrine disruptors. They can be detected in every
human being, including newborns. It's time to stop studying dioxins
and to start taking action,” said Jeanne Rizzo of the Breast
Cancer Fund.
“Dairy products, such as
milk, cheese, and ice cream contain high levels of dioxins. One way
dioxins get into dairy products is through milk from dairy cows that
are legally permitted to graze on pastures that have been treated
with municipal sewage sludges and other industrial wastes. These
contaminated soil amendments can legally contain high levels of
dioxins and dioxin-like compounds that are excreted through
lactation,” said Caroline Snyder of Citizens for Sludge Free
Land.
"We live on the coast of Texas. We are deeply concerned that people
living here aren't being protected with the information they need to
keep their families safe,”
said Tamara Maschino of Clean Air Clean Lake.
“The cleanup site in Pt
Angeles WA is a dioxin laden area -- soils, sediments, marine
animals -- from a pulp mill that bleached their pulp. It is a
CERCLA site. Also, two of their landfills in neighborhoods are
CERCLA listed due to the off site dioxin levels in soils and stream
sediments. We have high levels of childhood cancer for a relatively
small community. The Strait of Juan de Fuca is cultural,
subsistence and commercial fishing grounds for the Lower Elwha
Tribe, now dioxin laden along with many other industrial
contaminants. People also recreate in these waters, although the
State should make it off
limits. Eighty five
properties, mostly residential, have just been tested for dioxin.
About all contained dioxin; 45 sites at 11.1 ppt and higher, but any
amount is too much. These must be cleaned up to levels protective
of human health and the environment,” said Darlene Schanfald of
the Olympic Environmental Council.
“Scientific evidence shows
us that 50 to 70 percent of breast cancer incidence cannot be
explained by genetics or personal behaviors and that involuntary
environmental exposures to carcinogens play a large role in
perpetrating the breast cancer epidemic. Dioxin is one of the most
dangerous known carcinogens. BCA urges our environmental agencies to
skip convoluted regulatory processes because our people's health
cannot be put on hold any longer,” said Joyce Bichler of Breast
Cancer Action.
“Every moment that further cleanup of
dioxin is delayed, more people are endangered,” said Vivian
Stockman of Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition.
“Vietnam veterans and
Vietnamese-Americans, and their children and grandchildren suffer
from diseases and disabilities as a result of their exposure to
dioxin laden Agent Orange. More than three million people in
Vietnam, sprayed with Agent Orange during the Vietnam War and now
living in toxic dioxin “hot spots,” endure an ongoing public health
crisis. The American Public Health Association recognized the
urgency of this crisis and called for assistance for all those
affected and for cleanup of the “hot spots.” Veterans and others who
are suffering deserve no less!,” said Merle Ratner of the Vietnam
Agent Orange Relief & Responsibility Campaign.
“We are very concerned about government
making it legal to release powerful, long-lasting man-made poisons
and carcinogens into the environment especially with no knowledge
about their health effects or of the synergistic effects of
multiple, routine exposures to pollutants such as dioxin and
radioactivity,” said Diane D’Arrigo of Nuclear Information and
Resource Service.
“I was exposed to Dioxin
through climbing poles in 1982 at which time I was pregnant with my
first child. That child that is now 28 has life long learning
difficulties and will never reach her full genetic potential. I
believe this was due to my exposure to pentaclorophenol a poll
treatment that has a lot of Dioxin in it. The EPA knew in 1982 that
lab animals exposed to low levels of Dioxin showed neurological
damage the same king of damage I see in my daughter. I am mad as
hell that I was exposed and my child was harmed. Stop the madness
and release the report,” said Eden Brightspirit Hendrix of People
for Environmental Action & Community Health.
“Protect All Children's
Environment is a national support organization for individuals
injured and or disabled by chemicals, mostly pesticides. All of
these injuries were unnecessary and due to the governments failure
to protect us from chemicals. Dioxin is yet another dangerous
substance that continues to cause harm due to lack of precaution and
failure to protect the people. This is due to greed and politics
which is clearly shown by the programs that are offered by the EPA
and states that educate corporate poison pushers in how to avoid
fines and regulation, while offering little or no information to
citizens in how to detect poisons and their effects and even less
information to physicians on how to diagnose or treat chemical
injury. This process amounts to decades of growing government and
corporate conspiracy and treason against American citizens resulting
in blatant premeditated random homicide,” said Elizabeth O’Nan of
Protect All Children’s Environment.
“Because release of the Dioxin
Reassessment has been delayed, our community has been assaulted with
dioxin emissions for 22 years from a Wheelabrator waste incinerator.
If the Dioxin Reassessment is released, communities like ours will
have a powerful tool to convince regulators that waste incineration
is a dangerous and unnecessary threat to public health and the
environment,” said Jackie Elliott of CLEAR.
"We have waited far too long in North
Carolina for the EPA to act. Waste incinerators still operate 24
hours a day= and new waste to energy plants are on the horizon. EPA
must act now to reduce the threat of dioxin exposure,” said David
Mickey of the Blue Ridge Environmental Defense League.
“The presence of copper can be a concern
in biomass power plants that burn waste pallets, four of which are
proposed in Western Massachusetts at present. Copper-based
fungicides are the most common chemicals used to control mold growth
on pallets, and copper is a catalyst in dioxin formation. Dioxins
are the second most lethal substances known to scientists after
radioactive isotopes. Periodic stack testing does not accurately
reflect real dioxin levels, so continuous monitoring for dioxins is
the right approach. Any biomass or other type of incinerator must
have continuous emissions monitors (CEMS) for dioxins. These
continuous monitors have been tested and verified by EPA. Requiring
that biomass power plants monitor and disclose their dioxin
emissions real-time should not be a problem. Dioxin emissions can
be hundreds to thousands of times higher than what annual stack
tests indicate,” said Jana Chicoine of Concerned Citizens of
Russell.
"At this point, we are trying to save lives. The last thing we need
is a new study. It's time to release the study that was completed
many years ago,” said Alonzo Spencer of Save Our County Inc.
"Dioxin is one of the most serious
pollution-related health hazards. It is particularly dangerous
because of the potential for insidious damage to unborn infants and
future generations impacted by genetic changes. One facility in
Delaware, DuPont's Edge Moor titanium dioxide plant, reported Toxic
Release Inventory releases of over 60 pounds of dioxin for the year
2000. Dioxin-contaminated wastes from this plant have been used to
treat Wilmington and Philadelphia drinking water--and probably that
of many other places. This facility, the world’s first chloride
process titanium dioxide plant, has probably been emitting large
amounts of dioxins since the 1950s. Is it any wonder that DuPont,
headquartered in Delaware, has been one of the most aggressive
polluters stalling meaningful action against dioxins by the EPA and
Federal health officials? Is it any wonder that public health
statistics in Delaware are so poor? That infant mortality is so
high? I am speaking for a community, a state, that urgently needs
ACTION to control dioxin emissions. We need action NOW, not a
continuation of the unending cycle of further study and review,”
said Alan Muller of Green Delaware.
"Or nation--and world--must address the
insidious chemicals we consume, create, landfill, and manufacture
every day. Our fundamental ability to reproduce and live is at
stake. A vital initial step is to acknowledge the pervasive
pollution which plagues our bodies and environment. Release this
study,” said Bruce Wood of BURNT.
“There are many dioxin sites closed but
may still pose a risk due to encroachment of homes. Many other
sites have shallow PCBs and outlawed chemicals such as Lindane, TCE,
DDT, etc. As was shown with Agent Orange, when polychlorinated
chemicals combine with benzene, at high temperature and at some rate
these mixtures of PCBs create an unintended perfect storm for Dioxin
creation. Dioxin is a bad actor and many people getting exposed to
dioxin will contract a cancer 10 or more years later. The knowledge
and control of dioxin and limiting exposures will likely reduce
cancer rates, and could have a significant impact on Health Care
costs. Just the costs saved by cancer would help the economy – just
as cutting back on cigarettes dramatically reduced Lung cancer rates
in the years following tobacco reforms. Many friends have
endometriosis and cancer. My parents said they knew of no-one who
had cancer in their 20s-40s. Now sadly there are many Dioxin
related health problems occuring at younger ages,” said John
Caulfield.
“Cement plants in our community create dioxin as they burn hazardous
waste. There’s not enough of an awareness of dioxin emissions
because people are focusing on lead and other pollutants. We would
be happy to see some attention and emphasis given to dioxin,” said
Becky Bornhorst of Downwinders at Risk.
“It has now been 14 years since the closure of the largest known source of dioxin in the country, the Columbus, Ohio trash burning power plant. And for 14 years we have waited for the release of the dioxin assessment. No more studies, the assessment has been held captive long enough,” said Teresa Mills of the Buckeye Environmental Network.
It is bad enough to be tied to the archaic
notion that burning waste is the answer, but we don’t even do that
in the safest ways possible, with the benefit of modern scrubber
technology. Whether burning garbage, coal, tires, dioxin is one
of the byproducts. There is no safe level of dioxin. It is
unconscionable that the American public continues to be subjected to
one of the deadliest carcinogens known to man. My community, as
many others, is a hot spot for pollution, no matter which direction
the wind blows. This is unfair. Current laws must be enforced and
new legislation that is truly protective of this and future
generations must be enacted. The lobbyist stranglehold must be
broken, with conservation and renewable solutions as the only things
to emerge from the ashes,” said Maureen Headington of Stand
Up/Save Lives Campaign.
"As a women's environmental
health group Women's Voices for the Earth aims to reduce and
ultimately eliminate environmental pollutants that impact women's
health and their families and communities. Dioxin has long been of
concern to us, given the research linking exposure to endometriosis,
breast cancer and other types of reproductive harm in women.
Delaying the release of the dioxin assessment means a delay in
actions which will help prevent these health conditions in women
across the country. We simply cannot afford to wait any longer,”
said Alexandra Scranton of Women’s Voices for the Earth.
The Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) is hosting the next quarterly Midland/Saginaw/Bay City (Tri-Cities) Dioxin Community Meeting at 6:30 p.m. on Wednesday, May 6, 2009, in Lecture Theater G160 at Delta College, 1961 Delta Road, University Center. Please note the new location for this meeting. Agency staff will be available one-half hour before the meeting and one-half hour after the formal portion of the meeting for individual discussion with the public. A meeting location and parking area map for Delta College is available at: http://www3.delta.edu/maps/deltamaps/Map%20sheet%20w_legend%20(print).pdf The press release and agenda for the meeting are available at: http://www.michigan.gov/deq/0,1607,7-135--213608--,00.html and http://www.michigan.gov/documents/deq/deq-whm-hwp-Dow-Comm-Meet-Final-Agenda-5-6-2009_276282_7.pdf Please share this notice with others who might be interested in attending this meeting or forward their e-mail addresses to me for inclusion on the distribution list. If you should have any questions, please contact me. Cheryl
Howe
Dow sponsored walleye fest to donate contaminated fish to the poor
Excerpts from the Michigan Messenger article
More information about Michigan fish advisories is available at the website
for the Michigan Department of
Community Health. As reported by DEQ, higher exposures to dioxin in human populations have been linked with many adverse effects including chloracne, increased incidence of cancer, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, birth defects, and blood disease (porphyria). Fetuses, infants, and children may be especially sensitive to dioxin exposure because of their rapid growth and development. Low-level exposures to dioxin in human populations have been linked to more subtle effects on developing fetuses including alterations in thyroid function, immune function, learning disabilities, behavior, and effects on tooth enamel. Other effects of dioxins, including changes in liver enzymes, hormonal effects, and effects on the developing nervous system, appear to occur in many or most species, including humans. Based on available information, dioxins are believed to have the potential to cause a wide range of adverse effects in humans. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has characterized the mixture of group of dioxins to which people are usually exposed as “likely human carcinogens.” The EPA has also characterized 2,3,7,8-TCDD – the most toxic chemical in the dioxin group – as a known “human carcinogen.” In conclusion, the Midland city residential and industrial areas and adjacent properties, school sites, Tittabawassee River sediments and floodplain soils, all exceed the 90 parts per trillion (ppt) cleanup standard, ranging from 90 ppt to 17,030 ppt. So, why is the city of Midland withholding information on dioxin contamination? To protect property sales? Now is the time for the city officials to end its withholding of information on dioxin contamination and start cleaning up the mess. Richard A. Maltby Midland
|
| ||||||
|
|